Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Is this anchor set up right?

+0
−0

I was just looking at an article about an expedition on Eiger.

I came across this picture.

enter image description here

Is this setup right?

For more info on the expedition: http://www.markseaton.com/stories/eiger.htm
Kudos to the team :)

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/q/9795. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

2 answers

You are accessing this answer with a direct link, so it's being shown above all other answers regardless of its score. You can return to the normal view.

+0
−0

If it is load bearing, then hell no. This is a mess of cross- and ring-loading, which will break the biners.
If it is just a material storage placement, then it is simply confusing. And of what I know about the Eiger, when you find a good placement, you will never ever only use it for hanging up your gear, always for protection.
So all in all more information about the context would be needed to make a definitive answer, but I cannot imagine why this should be legit.

Edit: Unfortunately the pictures in the link given in the question are probably not in chronological order, so there is no information extractable about when or where this photo was taken.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

+0
−0

I couldn't have come up with a better example of "how carabiners should never be used" if I tried!

In fact, the most likely explanation for that picture is either such a deliberate bad example, or a joke.

A quite likely incomplete list:

  • Use of non-locking carabiners in an anchor - rightmost arrow shows a nut wire just waiting to slip through a wire gate
  • cross-loading, so much cross-loading! The middle arrow shows the most egregious instance - crossloading straight across a wire gate. That drastically reduces the strength.
  • metal on metal in a veritable daisy chain pattern (at the bottom there is a carabiner clipped into a carabiner, which itself is clipped into two other carabiners. This stuff can too easily lever itself open (or broken).
  • The whole thing is a complete mess, visually as well as technically, increasing the chance for anyone who adds or removes equipment to do make dangerous mistakes.
  • The sling going to the left (left arrow) indicates that the thing is loaded sideways as well as downwards - paving the way for those nuts to wiggle themselves loose.
  • One of the screwgate carabiners isn't locked. From the picture it can't be seen whether it actually serves any (critical) purpose, but if in doubt it should be closed properly.
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/a/9797. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »