Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Comments on What to do with all those >5y old questions?

Parent

What to do with all those >5y old questions?

+4
−0

What to do with all those >5y old questions? For curiosity, I was looking at the tag cooking.

Nearly all Q&A for that tag are more than 7 years old, some even 14y.

Should I still answer or make comments?

Looks like a waste of time, mostly, but not always, and I don't have any means to distinguish.

What to do?

History

0 comment threads

Post
+5
−0

This is a good question. Outdoors was one of the first communities we set up here during a time of turmoil on SE, and like with Writing, we bulk-imported content to help the communities to migrate without losing the content they'd invested in. But it turned out that most people didn't come here. Communities don't migrate; they fragment. It's now years later and we have a bunch of old content that has never been touched here.

We had a discussion about this problem on Writing and ended up deleting a lot of the imported content in 2021. We tried to strike a balance, keeping posts that people here had invested in while dropping the pure copies; my answer there describes the criteria we used. Speaking as an individual and not for the Codidact team, I suggest that we consider pruning the imported content here too.

Arguments for doing it include what you raised in the question, the effect on search-engine placement, and the "first impression" of a site full of old content. The main argument I can think of against doing it is that it didn't obviously work for Writing -- the community there is still small and pretty inactive, like here. But people (like you!) are here, and if we want to build up this community, we shouldn't let the outcome on Writing block us.

What say y'all?

Meanwhile, if you want to stop seeing these posts, you can use a filter. In the "source" menu, choose "native" instead of the default of "all". You can name the filter and make it your default for the category.

screenshot with source menu circled

History

1 comment thread

What about marking those q&a as "inactive" to the user, until new activity? The content would stay... (5 comments)
What about marking those q&a as "inactive" to the user, until new activity? The content would stay...
watchmaker‭ wrote 11 months ago

What about marking those q&a as "inactive" to the user, until new activity?

The content would stay, available for search engines and interested users, but contributors would be warned not to "ride a dead horse" unless they really want to revive that question.

Maybe there are some back-draws that I can't see on first glance, but, this is what discussion is for.

Monica Cellio‭ wrote 10 months ago

While not a full solution, I've updated the answer to show how you can filter these out.

watchmaker‭ wrote 10 months ago

It's not so much about me but about the general public coming here.

Monica Cellio‭ wrote 10 months ago

Understood -- there is a bigger issue here (and I do think it would be good to clean up some of the neglected imports), but meanwhile, this is something people who are already here can do if they want.