Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Fall/autumn colours in northwest North American mountains

+2
−0

I've noticed that the vegetation in the subalpine forest is very different between the Alps, the Urals, Scandinavia, or the Canadian Rockies. In the latter, I didn't find any at all.

In the Alps, the subalpine forest immediately below the tree line is dominated by spruce and larch. The tree line for broad-leafed trees is lower down, but all layers of the forest see autumn colours.

photo above Alpe Mattignale
Above Alpe Mattignale, Piemonte, Italy, 2019-10-17

In Norway, Sweden, and Finland, it is dominated by birch forests; the tree line for pine and spruce is further down. The beautiful autumn colours are in the birch forests.

photo in Børgefjell
Børgefjell Nasjonalpark, Trøndelag, Norway, 2018-09-13

In the Canadian Rockies, it was dominated by spruce, pine, and fir. I saw little to no birch or larch and was missing fall colors. For this reason (among others), I enjoyed my hike there less compared to the ones in Europe.

(will upload photo soon)

In the sub-polar Ural, I saw a mixture of all of the above, leading to the most spectacular mixture of autumn colours I had yet seen.

Photo in Ural
In the Косью river valley, Yugyd-Va National Park, Russia, 2019-09-08

For a hike near the tree line, I can find autumn colours in the Alps, Scandinavia, and the Ural, but I failed when I was in the Canadian Rockies. Can I find fall colours in Northwestern North American mountains? I might have the opportunity to fulfill my long dream of a hike in Kluane National Park this year in September. Since this is as far from the Canadian Rockies as the Scandinavian mountains from the Alps, there is no strong reason to expect similar vegetation. The Kluane National Park website does mention dwarf birches, but not how common they are. It does not mention larches.

How common are fall colours in the tundra and the taiga near the treeline in Alaska and Yukon? I'm a bit skeptical of x best places lists (in particular if they declare the most spectacular fall season in the entire world, some of their photos only show evergreen trees, and their ranking methodology is undisclosed). I was disappointed in Jasper National Park. Will I have better luck to find fall colours in the Kluane / Wrangell–St. Elias / Glacier Bay / Tatshenshini-Alsek area?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/q/24731. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+2
−0

Here's what I could glean from the websites of the parks you mentioned. The key thing to know here is that when describing the common type of forest in an area, tree species are listed starting with the most common species.

Kluane National Park and Reserve

A montane forest of white spruce, trembling aspen and balsam poplar covers much of the lower valleys and slopes.

This sounds like white spruce is the most common, but I would expect a good amount of aspen and poplar mixed in. Both should give some good yellow fall color.

Since the spruce bark beetle outbreak, the relative dominance of deciduous trees in the overstory has significantly increased in the southern but not the northern area of the Park. There is significantly more willow than tall regenerating spruce which could inhibit tree regeneration in the understory. As of 2015, the forest remained spruce dominated with a deciduous component within the range of natural variability. Source (scroll down to section, "Forest composition and structure")

However, most of the mature spruce were killed by the spruce bark beetle. Deciduous trees (IE the ones that make good fall color) are now more common in the southern area of the park than they used to be. All the dead spruce trees look pretty bleak in this photo. So, consider whether you'll still enjoy fall colors when they're intermixed with the skeletons of a forest destroyed by an invasive species.

Low-growing or stunted shrubs in the transition zone include: willow, dwarf birch, and alder, which provide protection for the smaller plants.

  • Willows turn yellow, but the foliage can be rather thin so they don't always provide a great pop of color.
  • Dwarf birch (Betula glandulosa) looks like a winner - expect low-growing patches of reddish-orange.
  • Alders (in this region, at least) don't provide fall color - they stay green long after other trees lose their leaves. (Source)

Wrangell-St. Elias National Park

Of the hardwood trees in Wrangell-St. Elias National Park the most prominent is the Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides).

The Paper Birch (Betula papyrifera) is not as widespread as the aspen. However, it is evident in Wrangell-St. Elias National Park. The Paper Birch species are very quick to colonize areas that have been affected by wildfire. Generally the areas following the fire will have a mixed stand of Paper Birch and Quaking Aspen.

Black Spruce (Picea mariana) trees are one of the two main evergreen tree species in Wrangell-St. Elias National Park. These trees occur in the more mature stages of the Boreal forest.

White Spruce (Picea glauca) trees are found throughout roadsides in Wrangell-St. Elias National Park.

To summarize: expect excellent fall colors in areas that had wildfires between 10 and 75 years ago. Areas that haven't burned in the past century will be dominated by spruce. I didn't find any maps of fires, but that information probably exists somewhere. Call and ask the visitor's center for advice.

Also, based on this photo of a caribou resting in fall-colored shrubs, you can expect excellent fall color in the unforested areas as well. I can't tell what species are in the photo, but interspersed through the grass are two kinds of shrubs, one a bright greenish-yellow and the other a muted red.

Glacier Bay National Park & Preserve

Pioneer communities can develop into dense thickets of nitrogen-fixing alder and cottonwood that enrich the soil and provide shelter for other colonizing species such as willow.

Farthest away from the glaciers in time and space, the lowlands near the mouth of Glacier Bay have become cloaked in a spruce/hemlock rainforest and lush, spongy tracts of muskeg. In the surrounding mountains, thick mats of flowers and heath carpet the alpine hills and meadows.

That breaks down into four vegetative communities:

  1. "Pioneer communities" - these have alder and cottonwood. Alder will not have good fall color, but cottonwood will. It's not clear where to find these communities - I guess in areas that were recently covered by glacier.

  2. Spruce/hemlock rainforest. Both are conifers, these areas won't have good fall color. These are in the lowlands near the mouth of Glacier Bay.

  3. Muskeg, or peatlands, sounds promising. Expect low-growing vegetation with good fall color (more red than yellow) interspersed with clumps of dark green conifer trees. These are also in the lowlands near the mouth of Glacier Bay. Of course peatlands are usually quite wet, so you probably want view them from a distance rather than hiking through them.

    Vegetation on muskegs is variable but is characterized by dense stands of sphagnum moss, herbaceous plants such as sedges, rushes, forbs, and low growing shrubs. In exposed locations and in drier areas, tall shrubs and scattered shrublike trees may be relatively abundant. Source: The Common Plants of the Muskegs of Southeast Alaska

    Mosses, sedges and rushes don't make good fall color. Bog shrubs tend to turn some nice reds, oranges and yellows, and they hold onto their leaves longer than many deciduous trees. The plant list includes leatherleaf, blueberries, and rubus (blackberry/raspberry/dewberry), which all have good fall color. The trees are all conifers, so they will stay green.

  4. Alpine hills and meadows, which are carpeted with wildflowers heath. It also sounds like the alpine meadows have a lot of bearberry, which turns a beautiful vibrant red in the fall.

Tatshenshini-Alsek Provincial Park

The valley of the upper Tatshenshini is characterized by open sub-alpine forests, often with extensive poplar stands and alpine tundra.

Extensive poplar stands means there will be good yellow fall color.

Below the mouth of the O’Connor River, the Tatshenshini is dramatically different. ... the mixed spruce-willow-birch forest found along this stretch of the river is unique in BC.

Mixture of conifer and deciduous trees means there will be some fall color mixed with darker green of the conifers.

In BC, the Alsek Valley is very different from the Tatshenshini. ... The broad, braided, silt-grey flows past dense groves of paper birch, willow and aspen. Higher slopes are covered with shrubby willows and slide alder.

Birch and aspen have good yellow fall color. Willows are usually less spectacular in the fall; as noted elsewhere some species of aspen stay green well into the winter.


Note: Unless otherwise noted, the source of each quote is the official page for that park, at the link provided in the park name.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/a/24738. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »