Timberland classic 6 inch boots for mountain hiking/trekking
The original Timberland classic 6-inch boots were made 40 years ago for the cold, wet and mountainous terrain of New England. They were innovative footwear for their time, but now have become mostly a fashion symbol.
They still retain their tough characteristics. So while now there are a wide variety of hiking boots available, I wonder if these classics are still usable on tough terrain? They don't have Vibram outsoles, cushioning midsoles, or goretex outers. But they do have solid grippy outsoles and a tough exterior that can take a beating.
I would like to note that various army boots have a build more similar to the Timberlands than typical hiking boots; and soldiers seem to do long trips in unpredictable terrain carrying backpacks in them just fine.
PS: Yes, I know they are expensive to use outdoors, and I am not proposing someone buy these for the express purpose of hiking, but suppose someone already has an old pair which is in good shape but no longer "fashionable" (discolored, somewhat creased, etc.).
This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/q/21381. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
2 answers
You are accessing this answer with a direct link, so it's being shown above all other answers regardless of its score. You can return to the normal view.
If you go with boots designed in the 1970's and 80's you get the comfort as was available in the 70's and 80's and if that is acceptable for you, why not.
Many people still hike on shoes which were basically designed much earlier and which will still do the job, if with less comfort but more support, or whatever other reason they see in using the older boots.
But before you set out on a long trip, well in advance, walk in the boots and (then) test them and yourself on the kind of terrain you will walk in your trip, with the kind of load you will carry.
City walking in boots, using them for work even standing up all day, is not the same as relying on them on a steep hill in rough ground. And unless walked in properly for the kind of terrain, blisters are a given.
It might be a good solution to wear your old, almost done in, boots and bring these as a spare pair, if you can afford the weight and space.
This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/a/21393. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
0 comment threads
This is really down to a matter of taste, fit, and comfort. These days through hikers doing long distance hikes like the Appalachian Trail or the Pacific Crest trail mostly go for light weight hiking shoes that are closer to running shoes. Other folks like the foot support provided by more substantial hiking boots. Some folks like Gore-Tex in hiking boots, others hate it and prefer simple leather.
The tread in the pictured boots looks fine, assuming the rubber is sufficient grippy. They look heavier then I'd wear, and I'd suggest you at least try on a lighter boot or a hiking shoe, but if that's what you have, and they fit comfortably, go for it.
This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/a/21383. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
0 comment threads
0 comment threads