Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

What do you call what amounts to a modern hybrid between a sneaker and a high top moccasin?

+0
−0

Thirty odd years ago there was a fad for shoes generically called snow joggers. It was a super lightweight boot in appearence -- usually 6-8" tall, but with a very light construction throughout. They were somewhat wide to accommodate more socks.

They had essentially no ankle support -- or maybe the amount of support of a canvas top runner.

As a fashion item they were cheap. Typically about $20, and they would last a year or two -- about the same as pair of Walmart sneakers. Tops were made of nylon fabric, probably a little lighter than pack cloth.

Even at the time they came in different styles. At one extreme were "Moon boots" with a thick layer of foam insulation. These were not considered 'snow joggers'

Most were two ply fabric with about 1/4" of Thinsulite. Any insulation on a boot makes it much harder to dry.

  • They were easy to dry around the campfire.
  • They were light -- light enough to jog behind a dog sled all day.
  • They were tall enough that you didn't need gaiters to keep the snow out.
  • They were cheap enough that if you melted on drying it, you didn't cry too hard. (I told people on my trips, "don't buy black -- you can't see it toast")

I can't find the equivalent now. Everything is either a boot, is designed to provide lots of support, is heavy, and clunky to jog in; or is a duckboot, with in effect a 10 or 12" boot dipped 3 inches into rubber; or is stuffed with undryable foam.

Sorel makes a large line of very clunky footwear. Great for standing around at -40. No good for running.

Various running brands make what they call winter running shoes, but they don't keep the snow out, and are not sized for extra socks.

Hunting stores have winter boots but again, they tend to be heavy, expensive and hard to dry.

I'm pretty sure they must exist, I just don't know the right name. Every time I use 'boots' I get stuff that is heavy. Every time I use moccasin I get stuff that amounts to indoor slippers. Every time I search for 'snow joggers' I get puffy things.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/q/21032. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

I have not found anything yet, but have two partial solutions.

Sneakers + gaiters.

For this I need to buy sneakers in at least 1 full size larger, and go extra wide. My intent is to go in wearing two pairs of thick socks. The gaiters keep snow out of the shoe.

Ideally the sneaker part is a simple canvas high top that will be easy to dry around the fire.

DIY moccasins.

There are various plans around the internet. While most of the plans are for the traditional leather, I don't see any reason that I couldn't use nylon coated nylon pack cloth for the lowers and uncoated for the uppers. The biggest issue here is how fast the sole wears out, and the lack of traction.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/a/21094. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »