Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Is 5R barrel rifling more accurate than 4 or 6 groove rifling?

+1
−0

I am looking for a new hunting rifle, and one of the features I keep seeing advertised is 5R rifling where there are 5 lands and grooves instead of 4 or 6.

Supposedly this makes the barrel more accurate because the lands oppose a groove instead of each other thus deforming the bullet less.

I have yet to see any solid evidence to back this up one way or another, and some say that the difference is marginal if at all.

Is there any good evidence or tests that 5R rifling is better than the traditional 4 or 6 land rifling?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

tl;dr: No. Any theoretical advantage of one rifling profile over another is lost in execution.

Since this is a question of practice, not theory, I appeal here to the experience of authorities in this space.

Bartlein Barrels, which for years has been on the forefront of barrel research and manufacturing, and whose barrels are the most widely used in competitive precision shooting, has several comments on 5R rifling versus more conventional rifling (i.e., even numbers of grooves with square shoulders):

Which is better 5R style rifling or conventional rifling? In terms of accuracy and barrel life we don’t see a difference. There are a lot of varying opinions on this. Some say if you want hard core accuracy to go with conventional rifling. We feel in the real world there is no real difference. The more uniform your bore and groove sizes over the entire length of the barrel, the more uniform the twist and the straighter the blank the more forgiving the barrel is going to be.

Some say the 5R style rifled barrels clean easier? Maybe from a carbon fouling stand point because your patch isn’t trying to get down into a 90 degree corner vs. conventional rifling. The way we clean our barrels we don’t see a difference. From a copper fouling stand point we see no difference here.

Bartlein does concede the possible theoretical advantage of 5R rifling in the way it engraves the bullets, but they have not seen evidence of that in practice. (And if they did, they would be among the first to advertise it.)

Among the factors that affect accuracy more than rifling profile:

  • Precision and uniformity of the bore. This is affected by every step of manufacturing and rifling the barrel blank, from drilling the bore to rifling it to finish lapping and stress relieving.
  • Finish and fit of the barrel. On the breech end a perfect barrel can be ruined if the chamber and leede are not cut precisely and squarely to the bore. On the muzzle end minuscule defects in the crown can markedly reduce accuracy.
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/a/22578. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »