Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

How is the maximum legal altitude for campfires determined?

+0
−0

In most national parks in the United States, campfires are prohibited above certain elevations (9,600 ft for Yosemite,10,000 ft for Ansel Adams with exceptions).

This is a good thing because after a certain height the trees don't grow fast enough for campfires to be sustainable.

Do note that this applies to campfires in the backcountry, not established campsites which have their own rules about wood gathering.

How exactly is the maximum elevation for campfires determined?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

2 answers

+1
−0

I have never run into this regulation, but then I use the national/provincial forests and not the parks. But if I speculate:

  • Subalpine areas have very low biological productivity. 3 foot high trees can be a century old. Impact of wood collecting would be extreme. If this were the reason, then you would find that the elevations tend to be upper treeline +- some distance. E.g. if treeline is at the 6000 foot level on the south face, and 4500 on the north (typical values for Alberta mountains) then setting it at 4000 feet keeps the fires out of alpine country.

  • Any sort of camping at high elevation may be discouraged. The type of people who want a campfire tend to be non-minimalist campers.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/a/20048. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

0 comment threads

+0
−0

This answer is from personal experience and personal observation in Yosemite and the other parks of the Sierra. (I wish I had time to research this answer properly, but I don't right now.)

The altitude above which fires are prohibited is what I call continuous timber line, which is probably not an official or scientific term. It is the altitude at which woods give way to scattered small islands of trees in a sea of granite. This transition is quite abrupt. May Lake in Yosemite, for example, is surrounded by woods, but a few hundred feet above May Lake there are only small scattered islands of smallish trees.

There are expanses of granite with few trees well below 9,600 feet in places in the Sierra, but these are islands of granite in a sea of trees.

Only yahoos would cut branches off living trees or (shudder) cut living trees down. Park regulations call for collecting only downed wood, of which there is plenty below timber line. Two good follow-up questions might be whether timberline is moving up as the climate warms and whether the Park Service is investigating prohibiting campfires other than in official campgrounds because of the increasing danger of forest fires.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/a/20052. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »