For outdoor recreation, what are the practical implications of the downsizing of Bears Ears National Monument?
In spring 2018, I intend to visit Bears Ears National Monument. Not any more; President Trump has declared to reduce the size of the monument. The area I intend to visit, around the Valley of the Gods, Cedar Mesa/Grand Gulch, and Dark Canyon Wilderness, are no longer part of the monument. In truth, I only became aware those destinations were part of a National Monument at all when the news reported they no longer were. I'm still going to visit the area — just most of my visit won't be on a national monument.
The Forest Service reports that monuments generally preserve current uses of the land, including tribal access for traditional plant and firewood gathering and for ceremonial purposes, off-highway recreation on existing routes, grazing, hunting and fishing and water and utility infrastructure.
With that in mind, as a recreational visitor intending to do hiking and backpacking, what are the practical implications of the fact that those areas are no longer part of a National Monument? In my understanding, it will remain public land managed by BLM and the Forest Service and the wilderness areas in the area will remain wilderness areas.
This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/q/17927. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
1 answer
In the US, the designation National Monument or National Park (same thing other than the first created by presidential edict and the second by congress), sets preservation as one of the top goals. The intent is land that is largely to be left alone, and not harvested for various resources.
Forest service and BLM land is intended to be "working" land. It's viewed as a national resource, although it generally has to be used in a sustainable way. Various people's and organization's view of "sustainable" differ, however, so some serious controversies can erupt.
Keep in mind that the Forest Service is part of the Department of Agriculture. You often see the slogan "Land of many uses" on signs as you enter and leave Forest Service land. While preservation can be a primary goal of some areas, others are managed for timber, for example. Hunting is also usually allowed, within state and local restrictions, of course.
Most of the nation's forest products come from National Forest lands. When the forest managers decide some area is ready to be harvested, they specify exactly what is allowed to be done where, and put it out for bid.
So to answer your question more directly, you as someone hiking around might notice:
- Timber harvesting in progress.
- Hunting.
- More back country motorized vehicle use.
- Fewer facilities like vistor centers and interpretive programs for educating the public about the area and its nature.
- Fewer restrictions on where you are allowed to go and where you are allowed to camp.
That all said, there is another designation, called a Wilderness Area1, that can exist within just about any kind of federal land. These places are strictly reserved for nature where "the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man, where man himself is a visitor who does not remain". This is the highest form of protection in the US. No permanent structures are allowed, including roads. Trails and trail signs are allowed.
Some of the most awesome wilderness areas are within Forest Service and BLM land. These are truly places where you may take only pictures and leave only footprints, and you should be careful about the impact of the latter.
116 USC 1131-1136, Public Law 88-577, The Wilderness Act, 3 September 1964.
0 comment threads
0 comment threads