Would waterproofing Styrofoam in a boat make water retention better or worse?
In theory Styrofoam is a closed cell product meaning that is water proof. In practice it tends to absorb and hold water It can take months to dry out very saturated Styrofoam.
As a rule Styrofoam goes in boats to provide flotation. In many applications the Styrofoam is in locations where water tends to pool and is difficult to completely remove.
I found several forum posts about ways to waterproof Styrofoam. Essentially use a paint that will not melt it, to seal the Styrofoam.
My question is will attempting to seal the Styrofoam, prevent water absorption or will it still allow some absorption and make drying it out even more difficult?
1 answer
Considering the construction principal: "Water Will Find The Failure," water-proofing barriers must be complete, or provide outlets.
If you seal your object 100%, it's ability to retain water will increase as water will be trapped by both the foam and the sealant. However, if the foam contains 0% humidity when you seal it and it is sealed 100%, then it will be perpetually dry. In both cases you are Maintaining the buoyancy of the object.
If you fail to seal the object 100%, or it suffers damage or degradation, then the object will have a tendency to retain water as it is added to the system and will generally Lose buoyancy over time with exposure to moisture.
Most foam floatation I've seen is protected from UV behind wood or fiberglass bulkheads that contain a drain to the bilge or cockpit. Through either damage or degradation the waterproofing fails and water will find the failure.
If the foam is holding water, it is more indicative of aging foam that should be replaced, not preserved.
Best of luck with the boat!
This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/a/16731. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
0 comment threads
0 comment threads