Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Why is the US kill rating so different?

+1
−0

In European 3D archery we've (besides a few "uncommon" ratings) two basic rating systems:

Rating EU

One kill

The yellow, red and blue area is "the kill":

  • First arrow - Kill: 20
  • First arrow - Body: 16
  • Second arrow - Kill: 14
  • Second arrow - Body: 10
  • Third arrow - Kill: 8
  • Third arrow - Body: 4

Split kill

The yellow and red area is the center kill. The blue area is the kill.

  • First arrow - Centerkill: 20
  • First arrow - Kill: 18
  • First arrow - Body: 16
  • Second arrow - Centerkill: 14
  • Second arrow - Kill: 12
  • Second arrow- Body: 10
  • Third arrow - Centerkill: 8
  • Third arrow - Kill: 6
  • Third arrow - Body: 4

These ratings follow the concept that you score more points if you hit the lethal point of the target to maintain a "hunt like" environment.

How the kill looks like

Split kill: Green Arrow 20, Red Arrow 18, White Arrow 16

This makes sense imho due to the fact that you hit the heart in the "Centerkill" or the lungs in the "Kill":

Kill


However, I noticed (at least) in the US the 3D rating is by far more complex:

US rating

I don't get a few things about this system. For example I feel like that you have to explicitly aim for the "non-scoring" point to hit it, what makes it a little bit useless. How did this system evolve and how does it make sense?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

1 answer

+0
−0

Arbitrary rules are just that - arbitrary. One point of difference is that in 3D archery in the USA, you get exactly one arrow per target -- there's no concept of a "split kill".

The ring you list as "non-scoring" is 14 points in ASA tournaments, but non-scoring in IBO tournaments. The smaller "upper/lower" 12 are only valid for ASA, and the middle 12 is only valid for IBO.

3D scoring for various associations

https://dmtargets.com/scoring/

Why? Who knows. But they have to be different or you wouldn't have two associations to join.

In other news, NFAA and USA Archery / World Archery use different rules too -- For instance: NFAA allows "barebow" to have a 12-inch stabilizer, where USA Archery / World Archery requires the whole bow to fit through a 122 mm ring when unstrung.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/a/18358. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »