Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Difference between Gore-Tex Pro Shell and Gore-Tex Active Shell

+0
−0

What is the difference between the two Gore-Tex technologies in real world usage?

Specific factors:

  • Which one packs down smaller?
  • Which one is more breathable?
  • Which one is likely to last longer?

FYI: I am planning on getting a jacket that would be for occasional mountaineering and regular commuting on a bicycle.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/q/4532. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

2 answers

+0
−0

Which one packs down smaller?

Gore tex active shell, it consists of 2 layers instead of three and the outer is bonded ot the middle layer reducing it's bulk.

Which one is more breathable?

Again, active shell. The thinner fabrics will naturally allow more moisture out, there are less barriers between the inner and outside. How much more breathable is questionable though?

Which one is likely to last longer?

Gore tex Pro Shell. There are more protective layers, especially on the inside as active shell has no inner layer, and the layers are built of sturdier material.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/a/5013. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

+0
−0

Outdoorgearlab has some quite nice compilation of different shell materials with their history and use cases.

If you boil it down with respect to your questions then Active Shell is lighter and smaller and is significantly more breathable but at the cost of durability. As the guys from Outdoorgearlab write it, Active Shell

is not intended to be worn under a 70 lb. pack.

I haven't used neither one of both membranes but from the descriptions of the use cases I would guess that you might be fine with an Active Shell as long as you want to use it for cycling and some occasional mountaineering day trips where you use it primarily as outer layer in good weather conditions. Concerning that you say you want to use the jacket for regular commuting maybe the robustness of the Active Shell could be the limiting factor as it might wear faster–especially when carrying a backpack or the like while commuting.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/a/4863. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »