Caveats of dual (propane, liquid) fuel stoves
My MSR Whisperlite has served me well for more than 10 years. It started leaking a few weeks ago, and I'm looking for a proper replacement.
I've read some good reviews about dual fuel stoves (amazon.com, travellingtwo.com), which can work both on canister gas or liquid fuel. They seem like a great solution: Using clean canister gas for day hikes, and switching to energetically efficient liquid fuel on longer treks.
Are there any drawbacks to these stoves, especially in terms of reliability?
This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/q/3787. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
1 answer
There are no reliability problems specifically with dual fuel stoves. Reliability really has more to do with the design and the manufacturer than the fuel(s).
So the best stove for you really depends on what you are doing. If you are making lots of short hikes with occasional multi-night treks, then a reliable dual fuel stove could be a great solution. If weight was your top concern I would not recommend a dual fuel because they usually have more bulk in their design.
If you liked your Whisperlite I can say that I use the International version which burns pretty much every fuel there is.
The Cat Stove design the Don mentions is phenomenal for reliability and cost, but it can be tough to learn to cook on them and I find they are best for the ultra-light multi-night type of treks.
This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/a/3803. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
0 comment threads
0 comment threads