Understanding/comparing via ferrata grades?
I have a bit of experience going on via ferratas. But never wondered about their grading.
I know that most countries have 1 to 5 grading systems. From that I have seen grade 1 would be doable by any body without any outdoor experience. Now how would higher grades correspond to fitness and experience?
Could it be compared with scrambling or rock climbing grades?
This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/q/6775. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
1 answer
So I'm reading that you already understand the grades as weda has posted them.
Now how would higher grades correspond to fitness and experience?
Skills != grade != fitness
. Grade is equal to difficulty and is subjective so this type of comparison never works. Some explanation on why this doesn't work in
How does a route setter grade a climb?
and Rating unorthodox climbs
Could it be compared with scrambling or rock climbing grades?
I can't find any official source but reading the descriptions I'd say they are equal to the scrambling grades commonly used. So I would suggest they would sit thus:
A : Walking (not graded)
B : Grade I scramble
C : Grade II scramble
D : Grade III scramble
E : Moderate/Difficult climb Sport grade I or II
So only grade E
would be on any climbing scale.
Disclaimer: I made this comparison up based on the descriptions on wikipedia. They seem to match the scrambling grade descriptiions. I've never been on a via ferrata!
This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/a/6776. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
0 comment threads