Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Is climbing an ambidextrous sport?

+0
−0

We know left-footed football players, we know right-handed and left-handed batmen and bowlers, we know left-handed or right-handed tennis players, and so on..

I know being a right handed guy I could hold a crack better with the right hand, and probably my first move upwards would prefer a right hand grip. But, does the idea or the phenomenon of climbing makes a person rely on both arms and legs equally (most of the times) ?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/q/8066. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

3 answers

+1
−0

Mostly yes.

Right- or lefthandedness is generally about very fine coordination and timing, which are necessary for accurate throwing and hitting. Strenght and endurance may be affected because one arm is then favored.

But the precision and timing of movements in climbing is much less critical. Using the hand that is better able to reach a hold given your current position in the route is far more valuable than doing the move perfectly on a hundreths-of-a-second and millimeter scale. And then, since both arms/hands are used equally, they both get trained equally when it comes to strength and endurance.

Of course that also means climbing will not make you ambidextrous in other things, since you'll not be training precision and timing.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/a/8067. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

+1
−0

I both agree and disagree with Michael's answer. If you can train your weaker hand to be as good as your stronger hand then good on you but this isn't always possible.

My left is much weaker than my right. I train my left all the time but it's always not as strong as my right. As such, I will sometime vary my approach to "crux" moves so that I can get my stronger side onto it if possible.

so to answer the question:

But, does the idea or the phenomenon of climbing makes a person rely on both arms and legs equally

I'd say no, Not equallly. You will always try and get your weaker side as strong as your strong side but it's very very difficult to make both hands/feet equally as strong (depending on your dexterity). So you will naturally rely on your stronger side (especially during difficult moves) more than your weaker side.


Interestingly recently I broke me right hand(I am right handed). Fractured the 5th metacarpsal and my knuckle collapsed. Suddenly I found myself in a position where my left hand was my stronger hand. I've been slowly building the strength back up, but interestingly I now feel a lot more balanced. I'm not so worried about using my left for crux moves anymore.

Begs the question what comes first, is your right hand strong so you favour it or is it strong because you favour it.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/a/8108. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

+0
−0

I'd say the answer to this question is yes.

Being ambidextrous while climbing will make you a better climber, because there are certainly routes that have forced, right-handed or left-handed cruxes that simply can't be done the other way around.

I've seen people really struggle on problems that force them to rely on their weaker hand, instead of committing to going for the next hold with the hand that makes sense, they'll spend excessive amounts of energy trying to match hands on a tiny geek so they can attempt an awkward off-balance cross to the next hold with their strong hand, which of course doesn't work much of the time and they end up taking a fall.

These types of climbers are typically found in the gym, where they constantly set problems that suit their style, and their strong hand. I knew one guy that seemed to always make the crux of his problems to be a big move off of a strong right hand pinch, so I'd set problems with strong left hand pinches just to throw him off his game.

Climbers naturally have a dominant hand, but if you asked me which of my hands was stronger I'd probably have to say both hands were equally as strong, but my right hand is more accurate. I don't think I can hold on with one hand longer than the other, but I certainly have better aim with my right when I'm making big dynamic moves. If I did have a stronger hand, it would be my left, because it's the one that's hanging on most of the time when I'm aiming for a dead-point dyno to a tiny crimp with my right hand.

I think you could get away with being a climber that is dominantly right or left handed, but it will put a limit on your potential. I guarantee that the strongest climbers are indeed the more ambidextrous ones.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/a/8120. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »