Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

60%
+1 −0
Q&A What are the pros and cons of a bear can vs an Ursack?

Ursacks Significantly lighter 8oz vs 44oz for 10 liters of space. Shrinks as food is eaten. Not a large hard object in your backpack. Bear Canister Legal to use in more places. More bea...

posted 3y ago by Charlie Brumbaugh‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Charlie Brumbaugh‭ · 2021-02-26T20:04:37Z (about 3 years ago)
Ursacks 

 - Significantly lighter 8oz vs 44oz for 10 liters of space.
 - Shrinks as food is eaten.
 - Not a large hard object in your backpack.
 
 Bear Canister
 
 - Legal to use in more places.
 - More bear-resistant, there was a case in Yosemite where the bears were rolling them off a cliff and then the canisters would shatter so they are not 100% bear-proof.
 - Keeps the bears from squishing your food which a Ursack won't do without an aluminum liner.
 - It is much harder for the bear to take the canister away, unlike the Ursacks.
  
 In my opinion, the Ursacks are easier to take backpacking and the canisters are better for places with a higher likelihood of bear encounters.