Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Why would hearing muffs be tested against continuous and not impulse noise?

Parent

Why would hearing muffs be tested against continuous and not impulse noise?

+1
−0

Looking at a new pair of earmuffs that a NRR (Noise Reduction Rating) or 34 DB. However the fine print says that said rating is for continous noise and not impulse (like gunfire).

Why would they be tested that way as a big reason people buy earmuffs is to protect their hearing while shooting?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+1
−0

Current testing is "is based upon idealized laboratory testing, the NRR can overestimate the protection"

There is some talk about changing the rating system, but in a quick search I don't find anything recent.

Some sources recommend wearing dual protection 'earmuffs and plugs' because the rating on the product, is NOT tested for impulse noises like gun shots.

References

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

General comments (2 comments)
General comments
Charlie Brumbaugh‭ wrote over 3 years ago

Doubling up only increases the protection by 5 DB https://outdoors.codidact.com/questions/58047

James Jenkins‭ wrote over 3 years ago

@charlie I did not dig into it, but part of what I read suggested the electronic earmuffs might provide better protection.