Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Which altitude profile and height is optimal for Everesting by hiking?

+1
−0

Everesting is an activity where the goal is altitude gain of 8848 m or more by repeatedly going up and down a selected route.

This is most often attempted by biking; however, hiking/running is practiced too. The whole process takes 20-30 hours; however, the time seems to be less important than the feat itself.

I would like to understand how to choose a route which makes this possible.

The rules (described on the site, but I added a few of my own) are:

  • Total elevation gain, 8848 m
  • Only natural scenery: no roads or stairs
  • No bicycles, chairlifts, buses, etc; no abseiling
  • Must travel the same route back and forth repeatedly
  • No sleeping
  • Resting, eating and drinking are allowed; no restrictions on resupplying along the way
  • The spirit of the challenge implies that your route should be mostly altitude gain, followed by descent on the way back - not a "10 m up, 10 m down" type of trail

So I wonder, first of all, which elevation gain is best for one leg of the challenge (assuming I can find any route I want, within reason)? I imagine that 3 times 3000 m would be inconvenient because of temperature differences, and 89 times 100 m would be a burden for the brain. What other factors should I take into account?

Also, which altitude profile should I use? Make it too shallow and you should travel a big distance; make it too steep and it becomes hard to go down. Should the angle be uniform, or is it better to have flatter sections along the steep ascent?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/q/20702. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

0 comment threads

0 answers

Sign up to answer this question »