Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Why do some prefer methane to cook food

+1
−0

It feels like methane is growing popularity to cook food while camping. I've only used the "classics" like methanol, propane and butane.

Why would I prefer methane gas as my camp stove fuel?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

3 answers

+0
−0

I've never heard of a methane stove for camping but I can give some justification as to why you would not want to use it.

  • Since methane has a much higher vapor pressure at room temperature than e.g. propane or butane, you cannot reasonably keep it in liquid form without a ridiculously heavy tank. This is the same reason why you can find household propane tanks for grills, but not household methane tanks.
  • If you do keep methane in a tank that you could reasonably bring camping, it won't be liquified, just compressed, which will mean that your payload of methane will be much less than for propane.

In summary, methanol, propane, and butane make good camping fuels because they can easily be liquified or compressed in a light container. Methane, has advantages for household use because of its much lower cost, but only if delivery lines for natural gas are available.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/a/15187. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

+0
−0

This may be a contrary position, but I think methane has actually gone out of favour in many parts of the world (definitely in Europe) as propane and butane have become popular.

In fact propane or butane have greater energy by volume and are available at every camping supplies shop.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

+0
−0

Methane is a biogas, so you get it from biological processes that otherwise would escape into the atmosphere.

When you burn methane, you are converting the methane into water and carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, but methane is a more destructive greenhouse gas, so it makes sense to capture and use.

Propane, butane and others also convert to carbon dioxide and water, but these gases are mined. So where as methane is already in the biosphere, using petrol based gases is adding carbon to the biosphere from naturally sequestered sources.

Only real thing you need to know is that you need a different regulator for your gas burning equipment. Methane is a lighter density gas.

I should add that methanol is a perfectly good and sustainable fuel, it is the liquid alcohol form of methane. Methanol although coming from other processes rather than gas capture at least still comes from the biosphere in the form of wood as the usual source.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/a/10228. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »