As of 2019, why do mountaineering courses still teach how to use a paper map?
I've been looking into learning how to mountaineer and noticed that the local mountaineering society still requires a training in navigation as part of the prerequisites for most of their basic courses. As part of this training, people are supposed to learn how to use paper maps and a compass, only then moving on to using various electronic apps.
But as of 2019, what's the point of ever touching a paper map and a compass? Aren't there now amazingly reliable devices that have capabilities far exceeding anything you can do with a paper map? Given the low price and weight of electronics, you could even bring multiple backup devices on the hike if required. Are there some considerations that I'm not taking into account?
A GPS can tell you with reasonable precision where you are. So far as I am aware, they don't tell you if you are about t …
5y ago
Many excellent answers have detailed how you need to learn reading paper maps for various practical reasons involving yo …
5y ago
The most important reasons have already been given in other highly upvoted answers. Planning, coverage, resolution, etc …
5y ago
There have already been quite some answers but I have the feeling that these answers are a bit one-sided towards paper m …
5y ago
I can't believe the convoluted answers. The answer is simple. A Map and compass WILL always work. The electronic device …
5y ago
Have you ever heard of the Uyuni salt flat? 10,000 km2 of almost perfectly flat surface, 3 km above sea level. 0 GPS s …
5y ago
A massive advantage of paper maps over electronic is the combination of area and resolution. You can take a bearing to a …
5y ago
The default expedition map in the UK is Ordnance Survey. The apparent most popular GPS map app for walking in the mounta …
5y ago
Maps and compasses are independent of any power source, so it is usually recommended to take them with you. GPS devices …
5y ago
Paper map screens are more flexible and they handle drops better. A paper map keeps power for longer, stays on for longe …
5y ago
Probably the simplest answer to my mind is that if you're going to have redundant methods for just about anything, they …
5y ago
Digital content is no substitute for skill Here. Describe to me how to fly the go-around on a Runway 13L approach to Mi …
5y ago
Among the great answers above, some touched on the price of electronic maps and their inadequacy for hiking (e.g. lack o …
5y ago
I have a very practical example of the value of paper maps: I found a waterproof, tear resistant map of my usual mounta …
5y ago
Paper maps do not run out of power. In an emergency situation you may only have that as an option
5y ago
Jonathan. I think the other answers miss the fundamental point. The GPS course just tells about GPS devices and how to …
5y ago
Ultimately a map is a map is a map. Regardless of the media it's presented on, whether that be digital or paper. You s …
5y ago
Aren't there now amazingly reliable devices that have capabilities far exceeding anything you can do with a paper map …
5y ago
I'll answer both as a geomatician who makes maps (both paper and digital) and deals with GIS data for a living. I'm also …
5y ago
The Map is not the Terrain Doubtless you've heard this aphorism, and perhaps it seems out of place for your question bu …
5y ago
The reason is that it is irrelevant if the map is on an electronic device or on paper - if you misinterpret the informat …
5y ago
This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/q/24498. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
21 answers
I'll answer both as a geomatician who makes maps (both paper and digital) and deals with GIS data for a living. I'm also a mountaineer, trail runner, backcountry skiier, and outdoorsman with extensive experience both of GNSS receivers and paper maps.
Reading skills
First off, reading maps is a skill that needs to be practiced and as for many other fields, like architecture and graphic design (both fields in which I studied in school), the basics are still learned manually, sketching on paper to remove the clutter of learning a UI at the same time as you learn theory.
It is difficult to read properly if you don't have a decent overview. Try reading the fine print on a contract, well if you want to read a large area on a digital handheld mapping device, you'll have a similar experience and I wouldn't trust the results unless you spent enough time to zoom in and out a few times. It's actually way faster with a paper map.
The data (quality over quantity)
As far as geomatics go, you quickly learn that you are limited to the quality of your data. Many digital products are not very good in that department, with several extremely dangerous situations that lead to deaths. The most recent being a Montreal man who died when his car GPS led him on a private unmaintained road instead of the main road. Don't assume it was entirely his fault. If the attributes in the data don't differentiate between road classes or incorporate recent changes to the physical reality, the fault is entirely on the data provider.
He got stuck on a broken bridge, walked 20km and died of exposure. People rely blindly on services like Google Maps, that have a massive database, but the scope of their data prevents them from addressing the details that can mean life or death. That's why a paper map crafted individually will always beat a global coverage digital product. The designer will know much more about the content of the map whereas if you ask Google to correct the data, as in the George He story, they simply don't even respond.
The scary thing is that a professional trucker ended up in the same situation only a week after George He, on the same road, but he was saved only because his employer was tracking his schedule.
Situational awareness
Another aspect that is often overlooked is that if you rely on an electronic device with GNSS positioning, you never really need to look up from the screen to know where you are. This leads to the dangerous idea that you can move inland without even looking at the terrain. One of the best ways not to get lost is to always take a look at the scenery behind you when on your ingress. Having snapshots of the scenery in your mind for your way back will help tremendously if you lose both your GNSS receiver and your map and compass.
This reflex is much more natural if you are forced to look around in the process of reading your map and placing yourself on it.
Situational awareness is probably the most important point I'm making here
Discounting this only shows your ill-preparation for the backcountry and lack of knowledge. Unfortunately, without a good mountaineering course, this knowledge has to be learned the hard way, which is through your mistakes.
Some mistakes can be fatal and if the overwhelming majority of outdoors professionals tell you that you need to know how to read a map, there's a good reason for it.
When a GNSS receiver is logical
I do a lot of bushwhacking in dense boreal forest. Then, using map and compass is not very efficient. GNSS is the best way to reach specific spots. A good technique is to get a bearing with the device, set it on the compass, then plow through the forest, adjusting from time to time. Maps are not very useful when you don't have landmarks to identify and this is one of the only times where they fail compared to a GNSS receiver.
Extras
For the sake of completeness, I'll add other details that have already been mentioned in other answers:
- Screen devices are too small to see the big picture.
- Devices do break. You need a backup and you need to know how to use it. Then, why bring the device in the first place?
- Energy is not unlimited because it weighs a lot. Instead of wasting that weight on batteries, you can bring other comfort items (nothing like a gin flask) if you don't rely on electronics.
This post was sourced from https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/a/24515. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
0 comment threads
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next →
0 comment threads